August 2005
Food and Environmental Hygiene Department
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region
This
is a publication of the Food and Public Health Branch
of the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department
(FEHD) of the Government of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region. Under no circumstances should
the research data contained herein be reproduced,
reviewed or abstracted in part or in whole, or in
conjunction with other publications or research
work unless a written permission is obtained from
FEHD. Acknowledgement is required if other parts
of this publication are used.
Correspondence:
Risk Assessment Section
Food and Environmental Hygiene Department
43/F, Queensway Government Offices,
66 Queensway, Hong Kong
Email: enquiries@fehd.gov.hk
Vibrios are associated with live
seafood as they form part of the indigenous microflora
of the marine environment. Foodborne infections with
Vibrio spp. are common in Asia. In Hong Kong, V.
parahaemolyticus continued to be the top causative
agent among all the reported food poisoning outbreaks
in recent years. According to the figures provided
by the Department of Health (DH), 552 confirmed V.
parahaemolyticus food poisoning outbreaks affecting
2725 persons were reported during 1999 to 2003. Among
these 552 outbreaks, 313 (56.7%) were due to consumption
of seafood. Inadequate cooking (59.7%) and contamination
by raw food (23.6%) were the main contribution factors
for these cases. Cholera appears as sporadic diseases
in Hong Kong. Information from the DH showed that
there were totally 49 local cholera cases reported
during 1999 to 2003. The suspected food item was identified
in about half of the cases, of which, seafood accounted
for about 80%. According to a Study on the Ecology
of V. cholerae in Marine Water and Live Seafood,
water samples taken from typhoon shelters and shoreline
waters were found to have higher chance of detecting
V. cholerae from open waters and fish culture
zones. Water samples which were tested positive for
V. cholerae also have higher E. coli
counts. The results also implied that if V. cholerae
is the concern for the abstraction of seawater for
keeping live seafood, both the site where the water
is abstracted and the E. coli count are important
parameters to be considered. Good manufacturing practices
should always be observed by the trade to minimise
the risk of cholera and vibrio food poisoning associated
with the consumption of seafood products. Hygienic
quality of fish tank water in particular the source
water for keeping live seafood is also important.
OBJECTIVE
The aims of this paper
are to evaluate the local situation of Vibrio species
(spp.) in seafood products and to make recommendations
to reduce risk associated with the consumption of
seafood.
INTRODUCTION
2. Seafood is a nutritious food
that constitutes one of the desirable components
of a healthy diet. Nevertheless, there are health
risks associated with the consumption of seafood.
One of the major risks involves the consumption
of raw or undercooked seafood that may be naturally
contaminated by foodborne pathogens present in the
marine environment. Such risk is further increased
if the food is mishandled during processing where
pathogens could multiply exponentially under favourable
conditions.
3. In contrast to most other foodborne
pathogens, Vibrio spp. have the aquatic habitat
as their natural niche. As a result, vibrios are
most commonly associated with seafood as natural
contaminants. Foodborne infections with Vibrio spp.
are common in Asia [1], including
Hong Kong.
Vibrio
Species
4. Vibrio spp. are
Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic motile curved
rods with a single polar flagellum. Among the members
of the genus, 12 species have so far been reported
to be pathogenic to humans, where eight of these
may be associated with foodborne infections of the
gastrointestinal tract.[2] Most
of these foodborne infections are caused by V.
parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae,
and to a lesser extent by V. vulnificus.[3]
The following paragraphs highlighted the characteristics
of these three vibrios.
V. cholerae
5. Among the vibrios, V. cholerae
is of most concern because of its ability to cause
cholera. V. cholerae can be divided into
serogroups on the basis of the O antigen. Of the
more than 200 V. cholerae serogroups that
exist, only O1 and O139 are associated with the
epidemiological features and clinical syndrome of
cholera. However, organisms of V. cholerae
serogroups other than O1 and O139 (non-O1 non-O139
serogroups) have been associated with sporadic cases
of foodborne outbreaks of gastroenteritis, but have
not spread in epidemic form.[4]
The most important virulence factor associated with
V. cholerae O1 and O139 serogroups is the
cholera toxin. Non-O1 non-O139 serogroups are generally
nontoxigenic.
6. Cholera remains a public health
threat globally causing hundreds of thousand cases
every year. However, this threat is much reduced
in places with safe water supply and good standards
of hygiene and sanitation. Cholera is an acute intestinal
infection. Its incubation period ranges from a few
hours to five days, usually two to three days. Although
asymptomatic infection is more common, clinical
illness may be exhibited. Symptoms include a sudden
onset of profuse painless watery diarrhoea that
can quickly lead to rapid dehydration, acidosis,
circulatory collapse, hypoglycaemia in children,
renal failure and death if treatment is not promptly
given. Nausea and vomiting also occurs early in
the course of illness. Cholera is transmitted through
ingestion of food or water contaminated with the
bacterium, especially via faeces or vomitus of infected
persons, directly or indirectly. Human volunteer
feeding studies utilising healthy individuals have
demonstrated that the infective dose is approximately
one million organisms. However, conditions which
decrease acidity in the stomach such as antacid
consumption markedly lowers the infective dose.[5]
7. Gastroenteritis caused by V.
cholerae non-O1 non-O139 serogroups is milder
than cholera. The incubation period ranges from
12 to 24 hours in outbreaks[4]
and is characterised by diarrhoea and abdominal
cramps. About 70% of infected individuals will have
fever. Nausea and vomiting are reported in 21% and
bloody diarrhoea in 25% of cases.[6]
Cases of non-O1 non-O139 gastroenteritis are usually
linked to consumption of raw or undercooked seafood,
particularly shellfish. It is suspected that large
numbers (more than one million) of the organism
must be ingested to cause illness.[7]
8. V. cholerae is a mesophilic
organism that grows in the temperature range of
10 to 43oC, with optimum growth at 37oC.
The pH optimum for growth is 7.6 although it can
grow in the pH range of 5.0 to 9.6. V. cholerae
can grow in the salt range of 0.1 to 4.0% NaCl,
while optimum is 0.5% NaCl.6
V. parahaemolyticus
9. V. parahaemolyticus
was first identified as a foodborne pathogen in
Japan in the 1950s. By the late 1960s and early
1970s, V. parahaemolyticus was recognised
as a cause of diarrhoeal disease worldwide, although
most common in Asia and the United States.[3]
In Hong Kong, V. parahaemolyticus continued
to be the top causative agent among all the reported
food poisoning outbreaks in recent years.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]
10. The illness caused by V.
parahaemolyticus food poisoning is a gastroenteritis
characterised by watery diarrhoea and abdominal
cramps in most cases, with nausea, vomiting, fever
and headache. The incubation period is usually between
12 and 24 hours[4] and the disease
usually resolves in three days.[13]
The infection is typically acquired through consumption
of contaminated seafood. These could be raw or inadequately
cooked, or that have been cross-contaminated by
improper handling. Poor temperature control of storage
favours bacterial proliferation. The total dose
of greater than one million may cause disease. This
dose may be markedly lowered by coincident consumption
of antacids or presumably by food with buffering
capacity.[14] One volunteer feeding
study done in Japan estimated that 2 x 105
to 3 x 107 cells have to be ingested
for disease.[15]
11. V. parahaemolyticus
is a slightly halophilic bacterium. The optimum
growth NaCl concentrations range from 2 to 4% and
poor growth is exhibited in media below 0.5% NaCl.
The bacterium is inactivated rapidly in distilled
water and growth at levels of 10% NaCl is inhibited.[16]
The organism grows at a temperature range between
5 and 43oC, with optimum growth at 37oC.
The optimum pH range for growth is 7.8 to 8.6, although
it can grow in the pH range of 4.8 to 11.[13]
V. vulnificus
12. V. vulnificus is an
opportunistic pathogen that can cause wound infections
and primary septicaemia. This bacterium has less
often been described as a cause of gastroenteritis,
and its role as a primary cause of gastrointestinal
disease remains to be determined.[17]
13. Wound infections occur in connection
with puncture wounds after handling of raw seafood
or trauma and exposure to saline environments that
harbour the organism.[18]
14. The primary septicaemic form
is the major form of infection with V. vulnificus
which involves a rapidly progressing septicemia
with few gastrointestinal signs. The incubation
period is from seven hours to several days. The
most frequent symptoms are fever, chills, nausea
and cardiovascular hypotension. This form of disease
is predominantly associated with the consumption
of raw bivalve shellfish containing the organism
by individuals with underlying chronic disease,
particularly liver disease.[18]
In these individuals, the microorganism enters the
blood stream, resulting in septic shock, rapidly
followed by death in many cases (about 50%). Over
70% of infected individuals have distinctive bulbous
skin lesions. For predisposed persons, septicemia
can presumably occur with doses of less than 100
total organisms.[19]
15. V. vulnificus is very
similar to V. parahaemolyticus in cultural
characteristics and sensitivity to processing procedures.
It differs principally in salt requirement and tolerance,
growing in media containing between 0.1 and 5% NaCl.
Same as V. parahaemolyticus, the organism
grows optimally at 37oC although it can
grow at a temperature range between 8 and 43oC.
The pH range for growth of V. vulnificus
is 5 to 10, with an optimum at 7.8.[20]
Vibrio spp.
and seafood
16. Vibrios are abundant in the
aquatic environment. Most of them require 2 to 3%
NaCl or a seawater base for optimal growth.[15]
Vibrios are associated with live seafood as they
form part of the indigenous microflora of the environment
at the time of seafood capture or harvest. Healthy
live fish is protected by its immune system and
therefore bacteria cannot grow in its flesh. When
the fish dies, the immune system no longer functions
and the bacteria present are able to proliferate
freely.[21] In addition, bacteria
may be found on the skin, chitinous shell, gills
as well as the intestinal tracts of fish or shellfish.[22]
If subsequent handling is improper and that there
is no or inadequate pathogen reduction step (e.g.
cooking) afterwards, the level of bacteria in the
final product may increase to such an extent that
may present a health risk to consumers.
17. Molluscan bivalves are filter
feeders and they tend to accumulate microorganisms
in the surrounding waters which may also contain
vibrios. They are usually grown and harvested in
shallow, near-shore estuarine waters and are therefore
likely to harbour high concentrations of pathogenic
organisms including pathogenic vibrios. As they
often are eaten raw or after a very mild heat treatment,
they constitute a significant health risk to the
consumers.[21]
18. Among the potentially pathogenic
vibrios occurring naturally on fish and shellfish,
V. parahaemolyticus is the most widespread.
Endogenous marine species of V. cholerae
can also be isolated from fish during cholera outbreaks.
It has been suggested that vibrios are the most
common bacterial causative agents in food poisoning
resulting from the consumption of shellfish.[22]
19. Water temperature can greatly affect the vibrio
levels in seafood. Vibrios can multiply rapidly
between 20 and 40oC. Growth at the optimum
temperature (37oC) can be very rapid
and generation times of 9 to 10 minutes have been
reported.[6]V. parahaemolyticus
is primarily associated with coastal inshore waters
rather than the open sea. It is rarely isolated
from water with temperatures below 15oC.[23],[13]
Factors affecting growth and
survival of vibrios in seafood
i. Effect of temperature
20. Growth of pathogenic vibrios
occurs optimally at around 37oC although
the maximum and minimum growth temperatures are
43oC and 5oC respectively.[23]
All vibrios are sensitive to heat. In shellfish,
heating to produce an internal temperature of at
least 60oC for several minutes appears
sufficient to eliminate the pathogenic vibrios.[17]
Chilling and refrigeration are critical control
measures to prevent growth of these microorganisms.
ii. Effect of pH and other factors
21. Vibrios are acid sensitive and
grow best at pH values slightly above neutrality,
i.e. 7.5 to 8.5.[23] They are
also sensitive to drying. While V. parahaemolyticus
has an absolute Na+ ion requirement and shows optimal
growth at about 2 to 4% NaCl, freshwater inactivates
this organism.
LOCAL
FOODBORNE DISEASE FIGURES
22. Food poisoning
and cholera are notifiable infectious diseases under
the Quarantine and Prevention of Diseases Ordinance,
Cap.141, Laws of Hong Kong. The following paragraphs
summarised the figures concerning local food poisoning
outbreaks due to V. parahaemolyticus and
local cholera cases.
V. parahaemolyticus food
poisoning
23. V. parahaemolyticus
ranked first as the most common causative agent
of food poisoning outbreaks in Hong Kong in recent
years. According to the figures provided by the
Department of Health (DH), 552 confirmed V.
parahaemolyticus food poisoning outbreaks affecting
2725 persons were reported during 1999 to 2003.
Table 1 showed
the breakdown of these cases by food group.
Table 1: V. parahaemolyticus
Food Poisoning by Food Group (1999 to 2003)
Food Group
Number of
confirmed case (%)*
Number
of persons affected (%)*
Seafood
313
(56.7%)
1465
(53.8%)
Mixed Dishes
68 (12.3%)
449 (16.5%)
Meat, Meat
Products and Offals
54 (9.8%)
314 (11.5%)
Cereals
and Cereal Products
39 (7.1%)
89 (3.3%)
Poultry
and Poultry Products
29 (5.3%)
187 (6.9%)
Fruits,
Vegetables and their Products
25 (4.5%)
98 (3.6%)
Others
15 (2.7%)
75 (2.8%)
Unknown
9 (1.6%)
48 (1.8%)
Total
552
(100%)
2725
(100%)
* Percentages may not add up to
100% due to rounding of figures.
24. Among all the food groups, seafood
is the most frequently incriminated food which caused
V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning outbreak.
It accounted for 56.7% of the total number of confirmed
cases. Table 2
summarised the various seafood items which caused
V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning.
Table
2: V. parahaemolyticus Food Poisoning Outbreaks
Due to Consumption of Seafood (1999 to 2003)
Food
Group
Food
type
Number
of confirmed case (%)*
Number
of persons affected (%)*
Crustaceans
Crab
46 (14.7%)
180 (12.3%)
Shrimp
/ Prawns
43 (13.7%)
299 (20.4%)
Lobster
1 (0.3%)
2 (0.1%)
Subtotal
90
(28.7%)
481
(32.8%)
Gastropods
Squid /
Octopus
55 (17.6%)
167 (11.4%)
Jellyfish
27 (8.6%)
204 (13.9%)
Subtotal
82
(26.2%)
371
(25.3%)
Bivalve Shellfish
Mussels
15 (4.8%)
49 (3.3%)
Oyster
12 (3.8%)
41 (2.8%)
Clams
12 (3.8%)
45 (3.1%)
Scallops
6 (1.9%)
24 (1.6%)
Other Bivalve
Shellfish
4 (1.3%)
29 (2.0%)
Subtotal
49
(15.7%)
188
(12.8%)
Others
/ Unspecified
Sashimi
30 (9.6%)
113 (7.7%)
Marine
Product Other
18 (5.8%)
138 (9.4%)
Marine
Product Unspecified
1 (0.3%)
4 (0.3%)
Subtotal
49
(15.7%)
255
(17.4%)
Fish
Marine
Fish
41 (13.1%)
166 (11.3%)
Freshwater
Fish
2 (0.6%)
4 (0.3%)
Subtotal
43
(13.7%)
170 (11.6%)
Total
313
(100%)
1465
(100%)
* Percentages may not add up to
100% due to rounding of figures
25. Of the 313 confirmed V.
parahaemolyticus food poisoning outbreaks due
to consumption of seafood during 1999 to 2003 (Table
1), inadequate cooking was the main
contribution factor which accounts for 59.7% of
the cases, and this was followed by contamination
by raw food which accounts for 23.6% of the cases.
These two factors contributed to more than 80% of
all the cases. Other factors included other reasons
for cross contamination, improper storage, inadequate
reheating and food prepared too far in advance.
(Table 3)
Table 3: Primary
Contributing Factors* of V. parahaemolyticus
Food Poisoning Outbreaks Due to Consumption of Seafood
(1999 to 2003)
Contributing
factor
No.
of confirmed case (% of total) †
Inadequate
cooking
187 (59.7%)
Contamination
by raw food
74 (23.6%)
Contaminated
raw food
14 (4.5%)
Improper
storage of cooked food
8 (2.6%)
Contamination
by utensil
7 (2.2%)
Improper
holding temperature
6 (1.9%)
Contaminated
processed food
5 (1.6%)
Inadequate
reheating
5 (1.6%)
Others
/ Unknown
4 (1.3%)
Food prepared
too far in advance
3 (1.0%)
* More than one factor may be involved
in an outbreak.
† Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
of figures.
Cholera cases
26. Information from the DH showed
that there were totally 49 local cholera cases reported
during 1999 to 2003. The suspected food item was
identified in about half of the cases, of which,
seafood accounted for about 80% (Table
4)
Table 4: Local
Cholera Cases by Food Group (1999 to 2003)
Food Group
Number of
cases (%)
Unknown
/ unspecified
25 (51.0%)
Seafood
19 (38.8%)
Others
5 (10.2%)
Total
49
(100%)
STUDY
ON THE ECOLOGY OF V. CHOLERAE IN MARINE WATER
AND LIVE SEAFOOD
27. Following the
isolation of V. cholerae in fish tank water
of two retail outlets selling live seafood in 2003,
there were calls to further strengthen the control
the microbiological quality of fish tank water and
abstraction of seawater for keeping live seafood.
The limited number of local study on ecology of
V. cholerae suggested that the non-O1 non-O139
serogroup were isolated in both local seawater and
seafood samples.[24],[25]
However, these studies were limited by small sample
numbers and limited coverage of sampling locations.
28. In light of the above, a one-year
study was conducted in 2004 by an interdepartmental
task force (TF) which comprised representatives
from the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department
(FEHD), Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department (AFCD), Environmental Protection Department
(EPD) and Department of Health (DH) in 2004 to fill
in the existing data gaps. The objectives of this
study are to determine: (i) the occurrence and distribution
of V. cholerae in local waters and its
association with environmental factors including
the E. coli count; (ii) the occurrence of V.
cholerae in live fish kept in fish culture
zones and its association with other parameters.
29. A total of 90 water samples
were taken from 15 selected sampling sites of four
categories (Annex I).
The V. cholerae count, E. coli
count, salinity and water temperature were determined.
Twenty-four live fish samples that were mature live
fish ready for market were collected at the four
selected fish culture zones.
30. Results showed that no V.
cholerae O1 or O139 serogroups were detected
in any of the samples. During the 12-month study
period, 14 (16%) out of all the 90 water samples
were tested positive for V. cholerae non-O1
non-O139 serogroups. Among these 14 samples, eight
(57%) were from typhoon shelters, five (36%) were
from shorelines close to the wholesale fish markets
and one (7%) was from a fish culture zone. There
was significant difference among the four sampling
site categories in terms of isolation of V.
cholerae in water samples (c2
test, p < 0.001). The isolation rate
of V. cholreae in water samples from typhoon
shelters and shoreline (13 out of 42 water samples,
or 31%) is significantly higher than that from fish
culture zone (1 out of 24, or 4%) (c2
test, p = 0.01) and that in open waters
(0 out of 24, or 0%) (c2
test, p = 0.002).
31. Water samples which were tested
positive for V. cholerae were found to
contain significantly higher E. coli count
(Mann-Whitney U Test, p < 0.001). When
analyses were conducted within the samples collected
at typhoon shelters and shoreline waters, those
water samples which were tested positive for V.
cholerae were found to contain significantly
higher E. coli (Mann-Whitney U Test, p
= 0.049).
32. No correlation between V.
cholerae counts and water temperature (p
= 0.96) and salinity of seawater (p = 0.89)
was found in the study.
33. Twenty-four water samples were
taken from the sampling sites within the open waters
category and none of them were found positive with
V. cholerae.
34. As for the 24 live fish samples
taken from fish culture zones, none of the fish
samples were tested positive for V. cholerae
even though one water sample taken from a fish culture
zone was found positive with the non-O1 non-O139
V. cholerae.
DISCUSSION
35. While vibrios are natural habitants
of seawater, it is not surprising that the majority
(56.7%) of V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning
outbreaks are caused by the consumption of seafood
(Table 1).
Among all the seafood items, crustaceans, including
crab, shrimp/prawns and lobster, represented the
highest percentage (28.7%) of incriminated seafood
involved in V. parahaemolyticus outbreaks
(Table 2).
Nearly 60% of all the V. parahaemolyticus
food poisoning cases by seafood occurred in 1999
to 2003 were due to the consumption of inadequately
cooked food (Table 3).
The second and third major contributing factors
for V. parahaemolyticus food poisoning
was due to the consumption of food contaminated
by raw food and the consumption of contaminated
raw food respectively. Thorough cooking and avoidance
of cross contamination hold the key to successful
prevention of V. parahaemolyticus food
poisoning.
36. Because of the availability
of safe water supply to the population and a reasonably
high standard of sanitation locally, cholera no
longer appears in an epidemic form in Hong Kong.
However, since V. cholerae are widely distributed
in temperate and tropical aquatic environment, in
particular estuarine waters and that cholera is
endemic in this part of the world, cholera still
appears in Hong Kong as sporadic diseases. For the
local cholera cases in which a suspected food item
was identified, most of them were related to the
consumption of seafood (Table
4).
37. In the Study on the Ecology
of V. cholerae in Marine Water and Live
Seafood, water samples taken from typhoon shelters
and shoreline waters were found to have higher chance
of detecting V. cholerae than that from
open waters and fish culture zones. Typhoon shelters
and shoreline waters (especially the shorelines
in urban areas) are sites which are considered more
polluted. Water samples which were tested positive
for V. cholerae also have higher E.
coli counts. The results implied that if V.
cholerae is the concern when considering abstracting
seawater for keeping live seafood, both the site
where the water is abstracted and the E. coli
count are important parameters to be considered.
Abstraction of seawater from typhoon shelters and
shoreline in urbanised areas for this purpose is
therefore not recommended.
CONCLUSION
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
38. To minimise
the potential risk of cholera and vibrio food poisoning
due to the consumption of seafood products, good
manufacturing and handling practices should always
be observed. Attention should also be paid to the
hygienic quality of fish tank water for keeping
live seafood. Source of the seawater is of particular
importance. The followings are some recommendations:
Advice to Trade
(A) Handling of raw materials
Purchase raw materials from reputable
and reliable suppliers.
Buy only those shellfish which
are fresh, with intact shell and free from abnormal
odour.
Do not abstract seawater from
shoreline in urbanised areas and typhoon shelters
for keeping live seafood. Use of synthetic seawater
is more desirable than the use of natural seawater.
Keep live fish and shellfish
separately in different fish tanks equipped with
proper filtration and disinfection systems. These
systems should be regularly maintained. References
can be made to FEHD¡¦s Guidelines on the Filtration
and Disinfection Facilities for Fish Tank Water.[26]
Scrub and rinse shellfish in
clean water. Remove internal organs of shellfish.
(B) Manufacturing and storage
Adopt a first-in-first-out principle
to store raw materials and keep them at appropriate
temperatures.
Avoid holding chilled ingredients
and finished products at above 4o C
for more than 2 hours.
Reserve a specific portion of
a refrigerator or a designated refrigerator for
storage of seafood to be eaten raw, such as sashimi
and oysters. Seafood shall be properly wrapped
or covered before storage.
Remove the shells of shellfish,
as far as possible, before cooking as it impedes
heat penetration.
Cook food thoroughly before
consumption. High-risk food such as oysters shall
be cooked in boiling water for not less than five
minutes.
Avoid preparing ready-to-eat
dishes and raw foods at the same time.
Avoid preparing dishes in large
quantities at one time and too far in advance.
Display seafood at 4o C
or below or 60o C or above in buffet
settings.
(C) Equipment, utensil and personal
hygiene
Establish a clean-up and disinfection
programme to clean and sterilise equipment and
utensils including fish tanks, refrigerators,
chopping boards, choppers, containers and mixers.
Observe good personal hygiene.
Food handlers should wash their hands with soap
and potable water thoroughly before preparing
food and after every interruption in food preparation,
particularly after having used the toilet.
Prevent cross-contamination
between fish tank water, raw seafood and other
food.
Advice to Public
(A) Purchase
Buy food from reputable and
reliable suppliers.
Do not patronise illegal hawkers
as their source of supply may not be safe.
Buy only those shellfish which
are fresh, with intact shell and free from abnormal
odour.
(B) Preparation
Wash seafood thoroughly before
cooking.
Scrub and rinse shellfish in
clean water. Remove internal organs of shellfish.
Remove the shells of shellfish,
as far as possible, before cooking as it impedes
heat penetration.
Cook food thoroughly before
consumption. High-risk food such as oysters shall
be cooked in boiling water for not less than five
minutes.
Discard leftovers or otherwise
store them properly in the refrigerator at 4o
C or below. Reheat leftovers thoroughly
before consumption.
Observe good personal hygiene
and prevent cross-contamination.
(C) Consumption
Consume seafood as soon as possible.
If seafood is not consumed immediately,
they should be:
packed and stored at 4o
C or below.
separated from raw food.
consumed within 1 to 2 days.
Avoid consuming the internal
organs of shellfish.
The elderly, children, pregnant
women and persons with lowered immunity should
be careful when choosing food especially high
risk food, such as sashimi and oysters to be eaten
raw.
Oliver
JD & Japer JB. Vibrio species. In: Doyle
MP, Beuchat LR & Montville TJ. Food Microbiology
¡V Fundamentals and Frontiers. Washington DC:
ASM Press; 1997. P.228-264.
3
FAO/WHO.
Joint FAO/WHO Activities on Risk Assessment
of Microbiological Hazards in Foods. Preliminary
Document. Hazard Identification, Exposure Assessment
and Hazard Characterization of Vibrio spp. in
Seafood. Available at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/vibrio.pdf
4
Heymann
DL. Cholerae and Other Vibrioses. In: Control
of Communicable Diseases Manual, 18th
Edition. Washington DC: American Public Health
Association; 2004. P.103-117
5
United
States Food and Drug Administration Centre for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Bad Bug Book:
Vibrio cholerae Serogroup O1. Available
from: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap7.html
6
International
Commission on Microbiological Specifications
for Foods. Vibrio cholerae. In: Microorganisms
in Foods 5. Characteristics of Microbial Pathogens.
London: Blackie Academic & Professional;
1996. P.414-425.
7
United
States Food and Drug Administration Centre for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Bad Bug Book:
Vibrio cholerae Serogroup Non-O1. Available
from: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap8.html
8
Department
of Health, HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable
Infectious Diseases in 1999. In: Public Health
and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.9 No.2; May 2000.
Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v9n2.pdf
9
Department
of Health, HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable
Infectious Diseases in 2000. In: Public Health
and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.10 No.4; August
2001. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v10n4.pdf
10
Department
of Health, HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable
Infectious Diseases in 2001. In: Public Health
and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.11 No.3; June
2002. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v11n3.pdf
11
Department
of Health, HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable
Infectious Diseases in 2002. In: Public Health
and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.12 No.4; August
2003. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v12n4.pdf
12
Department
of Health, HKSAR Government. Review of Notifiable
Infectious Diseases in 2002. In: Public Health
and Epidemiology Bulletin Vol.13 No.3; June
2004. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/dh/diseases/acrobat/v13n3.pdf
13
International
Commission on Microbiological Specifications
for Foods. Vibrio parahaemolyticus. In: Microorganisms
in Foods 5. Characteristics of Microbial Pathogens.
London: Blackie Academic & Professional;
1996. P.426-435.
14
United
States Food and Drug Administration Centre for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Bad Bug Book:
Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Available from: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap9.html
15
Kaysner
CA. Vibrio species. In: Lund BM, Baird-Parker
TC & Gould GW, editors. The Microbiological
Safety and Quality of Food. Maryland: Aspen
Publishers, Inc.; 2000. P.1336-1362.
European
Commission. Opinion of the Scientific Committee
on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health
on Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio
parahaemolyticus (in raw and undercooked
seafood) (adopted on 19-20 September 2001).
19
United
States Food and Drug Administration Centre for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Bad Bug Book:
Vibrio vulnificus. Available from:
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap10.html
20
International
Commission on Microbiological Specifications
for Foods. Vibrio vulnificus. In: Microorganisms
in Foods 5. Characteristics of Microbial Pathogens.
London: Blackie Academic & Professional;
1996. P.436-439.
21
Gram L
& Huss HH. Fresh and Processed Fish and
Shellfish. In: Lund BM, Baird-Parker TC &
Gould GW, editors. The Microbiological Safety
and Quality of Food Volume I. Maryland: Aspen
Publishers, Inc; 2000. P.472-506.
22
International
Commission on Microbiological Specifications
for Foods. Fish and Fish Products. In: Microorganisms
in Foods 6. Microbial Ecology of Food Commodities.
London: Blackie Academic & Professional;
1998. P.130-189.
23
Adams
MR & Moss MO. Bacterial Agents of Foodborne
Illness. In: Food Microbiology 2nd Edition.
Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2000.
P.184-271.
24
Xu H et
al. Occurrence and Distribution of Vibrios in
Fishes and Shellfishes in Coastal Waters of
Hong Kong. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. 1998; 17:
545-553.
25
Yam
WC et al. Abundance of Clinical Enteric Bacterial
Pathogens in Coastal Waters and Shellfish. Water
Research. 1999; 34: 51-56.
Tap Mun, Sai Kung (FCZ7) *
Kau Sai, Sai Kung (FCZ16) *
Cheung Sha Wan, Lantau Island (FCZ26) *
Tung Lung Chau, Sai Kung (FCZ29) *
Open Waters
Deep Bay (DM3) †
Mirs Bay (MM15) †
Port Shelter (PM7) †
Southern, between Cheung Chau & Lamma Island
(SM6) †
Shoreline Waters
Aberdeen Wholesale Fish Market
(ABR) ‡
Cheung Sha Wan Wholesale Fish Market (CSW) ‡
Kwun Tong Wholesale Fish Market (KT) ‡
Tso Wo Hang, Sai Kung (TWH) ¡±
Typhoon Shelters
Tuen Mun (NT1) †
Sam Ka Tsuen, Lei Yue Mun (VT3) †
Aberdeen, West (WT3) †
* Designated fish culture zones
governed by AFCD. Sampled by AFCD during even months.
† Designated water quality monitoring stations under
the Marine Water Quality Monitoring Programme of
EPD. Sampled by EPD during odd months (Typhoon Shelters)
and even months (Open Waters).
‡ Designated wholesale fish markets governed by
the Fish Marketing Organization, a statutory body
established under the Marine Fish (Marketing) Ordinance,
Cap 291 which was administered by AFCD. Sampled
by AFCD during odd months.
¡± A popular seawater abstraction point where seawater
was less likely to be polluted as suggested by EPD.
Sampled by FEHD during odd months.